Journal: Scientometrics
Loading...
Abbreviation
Scientometrics
Publisher
Springer
30 results
Search Results
Publications 1 - 10 of 30
- The generalized propensity score methodology for estimating unbiased journal impact factorsItem type: Journal Article
ScientometricsMutz, Rüdiger; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2012) - Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?Item type: Journal Article
ScientometricsBornmann, Lutz; Wolf, Markus; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2012) - Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer reviewItem type: Journal Article
ScientometricsBornmann, Lutz; Mutz, Ruediger; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2007) - The referee's comments on Gläser's criticismItem type: Other Journal Item
ScientometricsDaniel, Hans-Dieter (2006) - Social origin and gender of doctoral degree holdersItem type: Journal Article
ScientometricsBornmann, Lutz; Enders, Jürgen (2004) - A content analysis of referees' commentsItem type: Journal Article
ScientometricsBornmann, Lutz; Weymuth, Christophe; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2010) - A research-based ranking of public policy schoolsItem type: Journal Article
ScientometricsAsh, Elliott; Urquiola, Miguel (2020)This paper presents rankings of U.S. public policy schools based on their research publication output. In 2016 we collected the names of about 5000 faculty members at 44 such schools. We use bibliographic databases to gather measures of the quality and quantity of these individuals' academic publications. These measures include the number of articles and books written, the quality of the journals the articles have appeared in, and the number of citations all have garnered. We aggregate these data to the school level to produce a set of rankings. The results differ significantly from existing rankings, and in addition display substantial across-field variation. - The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a universityItem type: Journal Article
ScientometricsHug, Sven E.; Brändle, Martin P. (2017)This is the first detailed study on the coverage of Microsoft Academic (MA). Based on the complete and verified publication list of a university, the coverage of MA was assessed and compared with two benchmark databases, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS), on the level of individual publications. Citation counts were analyzed, and issues related to data retrieval and data quality were examined. A Perl script was written to retrieve metadata from MA based on publication titles. The script is freely available on GitHub. We find that MA covers journal articles, working papers, and conference items to a substantial extent and indexes more document types than the benchmark databases (e.g., working papers, dissertations). MA clearly surpasses Scopus and WoS in covering book-related document types and conference items but falls slightly behind Scopus in journal articles. The coverage of MA is favorable for evaluative bibliometrics in most research fields, including economics/business, computer/information sciences, and mathematics. However, MA shows biases similar to Scopus and WoS with regard to the coverage of the humanities, non-English publications, and open-access publications. Rank correlations of citation counts are high between MA and the benchmark databases. We find that the publication year is correct for 89.5% of all publications and the number of authors is correct for 95.1% of the journal articles. Given the fast and ongoing development of MA, we conclude that MA is on the verge of becoming a bibliometric superpower. However, comprehensive studies on the quality of MA metadata are still lacking. - Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts?Item type: Journal Article
ScientometricsBornmann, Lutz; Nast, Irina; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2008) - The influence of the applicants' gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov modelsItem type: Journal Article
ScientometricsBornmann, Lutz; Mutz, Rüdiger; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2009)
Publications 1 - 10 of 30