Journal: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Loading...

Abbreviation

Publisher

Wiley

Journal Volumes

ISSN

1053-8569
1099-1557

Description

Search Results

Publications 1 - 4 of 4
  • Faquetti, Maria Luisa; Martinez de la Torre, Adrian; Burkard, Theresa; et al. (2023)
    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
    Purpose With increased concomitant chronic diseases in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the use of multiple drugs increases as well as the risk of drug–drug interactions (DDI) and adverse drug reactions (ADR). Nevertheless, how medication patterns vary in T2DM patients across different sex and age groups is unclear. This study aims to identify and quantify common drug combinations in first-time metformin users with polypharmacy (≥5 co-medications). Methods New users of metformin were identified from the IQVIA Medical Research Data incorporating data from THIN, A Cegedim Database (2016–2019). A descriptive cohort study explored prescription patterns in patients with polypharmacy. The Apriori algorithm, used to find frequent item-sets in databases, was first-time applied to identify and quantify drug combinations of up to seven drugs to investigate potential harmful polypharmacy patterns. Results The cohort included 34 169 new-users of metformin, of which 20 854 (61.0%) received polypharmacy. Atorvastatin was the most frequently co-prescribed drug with metformin overall (38.7%), in women (34.3%) and men (42.6%). In the stratified analysis, a higher proportion of women received polypharmacy (65.6%) compared to men (57.4%). Moreover, the proportion of patients receiving polypharmacy increased with age (18–39 years = 30.4%, 40–59 years = 50.5%, 60–74 years = 70.9%, and ≥75 years = 84.3%). Conclusion This study is the first to identify and quantify commonly prescribed combinations of drugs compounds in patients with polypharmacy using the Apriori algorithm. The high polypharmacy prevalence at all strata indicates the need to optimize polypharmacy to minimize DDI and ADR.
  • Niedrig, David; Krattinger, Regina; Jödicke, Annika; et al. (2016)
    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
  • Burkard, Theresa; Rauch, Marlene; Jick, Susan S.; et al. (2021)
    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
    Objectives To assess completeness and validity of bariatric surgery codes in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD compared with Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES). Methods We conducted a validation study among patients in the UK-based CPRD GOLD with linkage to HES (1998 to 2017). Since the same surgery codes are used for bariatric and other gastrointestinal surgery we assessed code distribution patterns used in patients with bariatric versus other gastrointestinal surgery by presence of other conditions such as obesity and gastrointestinal cancer. We developed algorithms to identify bariatric surgery and calculated validity measures (ie, positive/negative predictive value [PPV/NPV], sensitivity, and specificity) of each in CPRD GOLD compared with HES (gold standard). Results Among 7 357 007 available patients we identified 10 190 patients who had a total of 14 046 potential bariatric surgery codes in CPRD GOLD and/or HES. Surgery code patterns differed between bariatric surgery and assumed other gastrointestinal surgery. The sensitivity of CPRD GOLD bariatric surgery coding improved from an overall of 56% to 69–71% when applying stricter algorithms (ie, in obese patients or obese, gastrointestinal disease/complication free patients) but PPVs remained at 53%–55%. NPVs and specificities of CPRD GOLD bariatric surgery coding achieved ≥99.8% for all algorithms. Conclusion Our results suggest that using CPRD GOLD and HES data and a wide selection of surgery codes will result in the most complete and accurate capture of bariatric surgery events. Validity measures of CPRD GOLD bariatric surgery codes were identical in obese patients and more restrictive populations.
  • Oshagbemi, Olorunfemi A.; Franssen, Frits M.E.; Braeken, Dionne C.W.; et al. (2018)
    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
    Purpose It remains unclear whether eosinophilia is useful for in guiding inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk of acute exacerbations, COPD‐related hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits, and all‐cause mortality with various levels of eosinophil counts among COPD patients using ICS. Methods A cohort study was conducted using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients were aged 40+ and had COPD (n = 32 693). Current users of ICS were stratified by relative and absolute eosinophil counts to determine the risk of outcomes with blood eosiniphilia using Cox regression analysis. Results Among COPD patients, current use of ICS was not associated with a reduced risk of acute COPD exacerbations, COPD‐related hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits, and all‐cause mortality. Stratification of ICS use by absolute or relative eosinophil counts did not result in significant differences in risk of COPD exacerbations or hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits. However, all‐cause mortality was reduced by 12% to 24% among patients with eosinophilia. Conclusions COPD‐related acute exacerbations or hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits were not reduced with eosinophilia among users of ICS with COPD. However, all‐cause mortality was reduced by 12% to 24%. These findings are potentially important and require further evaluation in prospective studies.
Publications 1 - 4 of 4