Michael Stauffacher
Loading...
Last Name
Stauffacher
First Name
Michael
ORCID
Organisational unit
02351 - TdLab / TdLab
169 results
Search Results
Publications 1 - 10 of 169
- Robledo Abad, Carmenza; Görlinger, Susann; Knoeri, Christof; et al. (2016)
- Linking stakeholder visions with resource allocation scenarios and multi-criteria assessmentItem type: Journal Article
European Journal of Operational ResearchTrutnevyte, Evelina; Stauffacher, Michael; Scholz, Roland W. (2012) - Landscape multifunctionalityItem type: Journal Article
Regional Environmental ChangeBolliger, Janine; Bättig, Michèle; Gallati, Justus; et al. (2011) - Entanglement of Top-Down and Bottom-Up: Sociotechnical Innovation Pathways of Geothermal Energy in SwitzerlandItem type: Journal Article
The Journal of Environment & DevelopmentEjderyan, Olivier; Ruef, Franziska; Stauffacher, Michael (2020) - Nachhaltige Arealentwicklung – Der Fall Siemensareal in Zug Institute for Environmental Decisions SNcaietunrcael IanntderItem type: Report
ETH-NSSI FallstudieMoser, Corinne; von Wirth, Timo; Adler, Carolina; et al. (2014) - Material and money flows as a means for industry analysis of recycling schemesItem type: Journal Article
Resources, Conservation and RecyclingLang, Daniel J.; Binder, Claudia R.; Stauffacher, Michael; et al. (2006) - Bahnhof im Dornröschenschlaf?Item type: Other Publication
Stadtentwicklung Basel Nord : Ausstellung und Veranstaltungen in der Voltahalle Basel, 16.-28. September 2005Stauffacher, Michael (2005) - Carbon dioxide removal: A source of ambition or of delays? Examining expectations for CDR in Swiss climate policyItem type: Journal Article
Environmental Science & Policyvon Rothkirch u. Panthen Gómez, Juanita; Ejderyan, Olivier; Stauffacher, Michael (2024)Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is recognized as an important tool for addressing residual emissions and achieving net-zero emission targets. While some have cautioned that a focus on CDR in policy processes may lead to delayed efforts to mitigate emissions, others have argued that such concerns are unwarranted. Nevertheless, the circumstances under which CDR could help or delay emissions mitigation in given contexts remain unclear. This paper explores the emerging discourse on CDR in Switzerland. We examined how the CDR community legitimizes CDR and limits its scope, and what the implications are for emissions mitigation. Switzerland is home to growing businesses in CDR and has pioneered the implementation of international offsetting projects under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement. We found that numerous promises help legitimize and attract interest in CDR. Actors use discursive strategies and rules to limit CDR and avoid disappointment in its contribution to climate mitigation. The idea that emission reduction should prevail over removal is promoted accordingly, which ironically helps legitimize the CDR idea yet dodges the question of how much removal is possible and for balancing which emissions. Superficial engagement with the issue is reinforced by the normalization of inflated promises and the sentiment that the mitigation deterrence rhetoric erodes trust in CDR. We argue that this can contribute to mitigation delays by evading the debate on what it is possible to remove and taking resources from alternative measures. We recommend a thorough discussion to examine the risks and the implementation of rules that minimize them. - Priority themes for Swiss sustainability researchItem type: Report
Swiss Academies ReportsWuelser, Gabriela; Chesney, Marc; Mayer, Heike; et al. (2020)Using six priority themes, the "White Paper on Sustainability Research" outlines Switzerland's most urgent research needs in order to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The priority themes were developed by 30 experts from science and practice on the basis of a broad-based dialogue with over 100 stakeholders from science, business, administration and civil society. - Rösch, Andreas; Seidl, Roman; Stauffacher, Michael (2013)
Publications 1 - 10 of 169