Nadja Beeler


Loading...

Last Name

Beeler

First Name

Nadja

Organisational unit

Search Results

Publications1 - 10 of 24
  • Beeler, Nadja; Ziegler, Esther; Volz, Andreas; et al. (2024)
    Advances in Health Sciences Education
    Even though past research suggests that visual learning may benefit from conceptual knowledge, current interventions for medical image evaluation often focus on procedural knowledge, mainly by teaching classification algorithms. We compared the efficacy of pure procedural knowledge (three-point checklist for evaluating skin lesions) versus combined procedural plus conceptual knowledge (histological explanations for each of the three points). All students then trained their classification skills with a visual learning resource that included images of two types of pigmented skin lesions: benign nevi and malignant melanomas. Both treatments produced significant and long-lasting effects on diagnostic accuracy in transfer tasks. However, only students in the combined procedural plus conceptual knowledge condition significantly improved their diagnostic performance in classifying lesions they had seen before in the pre- and post-tests. Findings suggest that the provision of additional conceptual knowledge supported error correction mechanisms.
  • Veenstra, Bertil J.; Wyss, Thomas; Roos, Lilian; et al. (2018)
    Gait & Posture
  • Beeler, Nadja; Ziegler, Esther; Volz, Andreas; et al. (2022)
  • Beeler, Nadja (2023)
    Visual learning is essential in many medical domains. In dermatology, for example, it is crucial but challenging for prospective health professionals to learn the visual distinction between potentially harmful and harmless skin lesions, such as malignant melanomas and benign nevi. However, studies testing different learning interventions in medicine are limited, and we need a better understanding of visual learning to improve current teaching methods. With this thesis, I make five main contributions: four empirical studies and one online learning tool. Study I explored factors related to the performance of laypersons diagnosing pigmented skin cancer. Knowledge about these factors is a prerequisite for designing and evaluating evidence-based learning interventions. Hence, I investigated how the characteristics of the skin lesions, the number of classified lesions and the response times of laypeople were related to their diagnostic performance. The results showed large differences between the lesions, as some were classified correctly by more than 90% and others by less than 10% of the participants. For melanomas, the correct diagnosis was provided significantly more often than for nevi. Furthermore, I found a positive relationship between the number of solved tasks and diagnostic performance in the first 50 classification tasks. However, after 50 tasks, the participants’ performance decreased, indicating a trade-off between adaptation and fatigue effects. Finally, investigating the response times revealed that compared to true decisions, participants spent longer on false-negative but not on false-positive decisions. These results provided novel knowledge about performance-related factors, which are helpful for designing learning interventions and performance tests for melanoma detection. Study II investigated the relationship between diagnostic performance and response time in visual skin lesion classification tasks in medical students versus dermatologists. Assessing performance and response time provides objectively measurable data on diagnostic decisions; hence, many studies in medical education include these variables. However, the relationship between these two measurands has only been investigated within expertise levels, mostly showing negative correlations. To complement previous findings, I illuminated the differences in the performance–response time relationship between medical students and dermatologists in visual skin lesion classification tasks. The participants had to diagnose malignant melanomas versus benign nevi in online surveys. I found that the negative correlation between diagnostic performance and response time was more pronounced in experts, indicating that the strength of the performance–response time relationship might generally increase with diagnosticians’ abilities and that practitioners could profit from educational interventions targeting awareness of response time. Study III looked into the role of active and passive tasks in visual learning. Prior research has shown that combining active and passive tasks improves learning efficiency. However, previous studies have only implemented passive before active tasks, contradicting findings on productive failure learning designs. I aimed to replicate and extend earlier results by comparing 1) combined versus uniform active and passive tasks and 2) active before passive versus passive before active tasks in the visual detection of pigmented skin cancer. The sample consisted of 161 university students without professional knowledge about skin lesion classification. I randomly assigned the participants to four groups: 1) active before passive, 2) passive before active, 3) uniform active, and 4) uniform passive tasks. The students completed the learning intervention, an intermediate and three post-tests (immediate, two days delayed and two weeks delayed) online. In line with my hypotheses, I found that learning with combined active and passive tasks led to higher diagnostic accuracy in difficult-to-classify skin lesions in the two-week delayed post-test than learning with only one of the two task types. Furthermore, I found that active before passive tasks resulted in higher diagnostic accuracy than passive before active tasks. These findings suggest that initial active tasks improve long-term visual learning outcomes in difficult melanoma detection tasks. However, future research needs to confirm this result and explore the underlying learning mechanisms further. Study IV investigated the effects of procedural and conceptual knowledge on visual learning. Even though past research suggests that visual learning may benefit from conceptual knowledge, current interventions for medical image evaluation often focus on procedural knowledge, mainly by teaching classification algorithms. Using a double transfer research design, I compared the efficacy of pure procedural knowledge (three-point checklist for evaluating skin lesions) versus combined procedural plus conceptual knowledge (histological explanations for each of the three points). All students then trained their classification skills with a visual learning resource that included images of two types of pigmented skin lesions: benign nevi and malignant melanomas. Both treatments produced significant and long-lasting effects on diagnostic accuracy in transfer tasks. However, only students in the combined procedural plus conceptual knowledge condition significantly improved their diagnostic performance in classifying lesions they had seen before in the pre- and post-tests. Findings suggest that the provision of additional conceptual knowledge supported error correction mechanisms. Finally, developing the online learning tool Dermoscopy Trainer concretised the empirical findings of the abovementioned studies to ensure their translation to educational practice. Overall, this thesis contributes to improving visual learning interventions for melanoma detection by adding to the literature in this field and by providing a novel, evidence-based learning tool.
  • Roos, Lilian; Beeler, Nadja; Wyss, Thomas (2017)
    Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
  • Gilgen-Ammann, Rahel; Roos, Lilian; Wyss, Thomas; et al. (2021)
    Physiological Measurement
    Objectives.To investigate the validity of different devices and algorithms used in military organizations worldwide to assess physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) and heart rate (HR) among soldiers. Design. Device validation study. Methods. Twenty-three male participants serving their mandatory military service accomplished, firstly, nine different military specific activities indoors, and secondly, a normal military routine outdoors. Participants wore simultaneously an ActiHeart, Everion, MetaMax 3B, Garmin Fenix 3, Hidalgo EQ02, and PADIS 2.0 system. The PAEE and HR data of each system were compared to the criterion measures MetaMax 3B and Hidalgo EQ02, respectively. Results. Overall, the recorded systematic errors in PAEE estimation ranged from 0.1 (±1.8) kcal.min−1 to −1.7 (±1.8) kcal.min−1 for the systems PADIS 2.0 and Hidalgo EQ02 running the Royal Dutch Army algorithm, respectively, and in the HR assessment ranged from −0.1 (±2.1) b.min−1 to 0.8 (±3.0) b.min−1 for the PADIS 2.0 and ActiHeart systems, respectively. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) in PAEE estimation ranged from 29.9% to 75.1%, with only the Everion system showing an overall MAPE <30%, but all investigated devices reported overall MAPE <1.4% in the HR assessment. Conclusions. The present study demonstrated poor to moderate validity in terms of PAEE estimation, but excellent validity in all investigated devices in terms of HR assessment. Overall, the Everion performed among the best in both parameters and with a device placement on the upper arm, the Everion system is particularly useful during military service, as it does not interfere with other relevant equipment.
  • Beeler, Nadja; Gilgen-Ammann, Rahel; Roos, Lilian; et al. (2017)
    Schriften der Deutschen Vereinigung für Sportwissenschaft ~ Innovation & Technologie im Sport. Abstractband zum 23. dvs-Hochschultag in München vom 13.-15. September 2017
  • Beeler, Nadja; Roos, Lilian; Ammann, Rahel; et al. (2015)
    Seventh Annual Congres of the Swiss Society of Sports Sciences, Lausanne, 12-13 February 2015 : Programme and Book of Abstracts
  • Beeler, Nadja; Roos, Lilian; Delves, Simon K.; et al. (2018)
    IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
  • Delves, Simon K.; Wyss, Thomas; Roos, Lilian; et al. (2016)
Publications1 - 10 of 24