Inadequacy of Modal Logic in Quantum Settings
OPEN ACCESS
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
2019-01-31
Publication Type
Conference Paper
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
OPEN ACCESS
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
We test the principles of classical modal logic in fully quantum settings. Modal logic models our reasoning in multi-agent problems, and allows us to solve puzzles like the muddy children paradox. The Frauchiger-Renner thought experiment highlighted fundamental problems in applying classical reasoning when quantum agents are involved; we take it as a guiding example to test the axioms of classical modal logic. In doing so, we find a problem in the original formulation of the Frauchiger-Renner theorem: a missing assumption about unitarity of evolution is necessary to derive a contradiction and prove the theorem. Adding this assumption clarifies how different interpretations of quantum theory fit in, i.e., which properties they violate. Finally, we show how most of the axioms of classical modal logic break down in quantum settings, and attempt to generalize them. Namely, we introduce constructions of trust and context, which highlight the importance of an exact structure of trust relations between agents. We propose a challenge to the community: to find conditions for the validity of trust relations, strong enough to exorcise the paradox and weak enough to still recover classical logic.
Permanent link
Publication status
published
External links
Book title
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic
Volume
287
Pages / Article No.
267 - 297
Publisher
Open Publishing Association
Event
15th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic (QPL 2018)
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Organisational unit
03781 - Renner, Renato / Renner, Renato
Notes
Funding
Related publications and datasets
Is new version of: