Bug or feature? Institutional misalignments between construction technology and venture capital
OPEN ACCESS
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
2025
Publication Type
Journal Article
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
OPEN ACCESS
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
Despite substantial investments into new technologies, the adoption of systemic innovations such as construction robotics remains limited. Therefore, this study investigates the discrepancy between the assumed advantages of construction technologies and their actual performance during practical implementation, using construction robotics as the empirical case. Through an abductive thematic analysis of 127 interviews across Europe and North America, we identify six enablers of institutional misalignment: cognitive frame differences, divergent time horizons, conflicting market strategies, product versus revenue focus, varying risk tolerances, and information asymmetry. These misalignments between startup founders’ technological logic and investors’ economic logic constrain adoption, emphasizing the influence of institutional dynamics over technological feasibility. Our findings suggest these challenges are not unique to construction robotics but may extend to other emerging construction technologies. This highlights the critical need for aligning institutional logics to fully harness the potential of innovation in construction.
Permanent link
Publication status
published
External links
Editor
Book title
Journal / series
Volume
43 (2)
Pages / Article No.
130 - 152
Publisher
Routledge
Event
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Institutional logic; Entrepreneurship; AEC; Construction robotics; New practice
Organisational unit
09624 - Hall, Daniel M. (ehemalig) / Hall, Daniel M. (former)
02284 - NFS Digitale Fabrikation / NCCR Digital Fabrication
Notes
Funding
205604 - NCCR Digital Fabrication: Innovative Building Processes in Architecture (phase III) (SNF)
Related publications and datasets
Continues: