The potential for structural errors in emergent constraints


Loading...

Date

2021-08-23

Publication Type

Review Article

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric

Data

Abstract

Studies of emergent constraints have frequently proposed that a single metric can constrain future responses of the Earth system to anthropogenic emissions. Here, we illustrate that strong relationships between observables and future climate across an ensemble can arise from common structural model assumptions with few degrees of freedom. Such cases have the potential to produce strong yet overconfident constraints when processes are represented in a common, oversimplified fashion throughout the ensemble. We consider these issues in the context of a collection of published constraints and argue that although emergent constraints are potentially powerful tools for understanding ensemble response variation and relevant observables, their naive application to reduce uncertainties in unknown climate responses could lead to bias and overconfidence in constrained projections. The prevalence of this thinking has led to literature in which statements are made on the probability bounds of key climate variables that were confident yet inconsistent between studies. Together with statistical robustness and a mechanism, assessments of climate responses must include multiple lines of evidence to identify biases that can arise from shared, oversimplified modelling assumptions that impact both present and future climate simulations in order to mitigate against the influence of shared structural biases.

Publication status

published

Editor

Book title

Volume

12 (3)

Pages / Article No.

899 - 918

Publisher

Copernicus

Event

Edition / version

Methods

Software

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

Organisational unit

03777 - Knutti, Reto / Knutti, Reto check_circle

Notes

Funding

Related publications and datasets