The response of the carbon cycle in undisturbed forest ecosystems to climate change: A review of plant-soil models
OPEN ACCESS
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
1994
Publication Type
Report
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
OPEN ACCESS
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
We compared 6 plantsoil models from the literature which describe the Cdynamics in forests and include climatic forcing explicitly. Our selection included the two physiological models FORESTBGC and TCX, the ecosystem/population model FORCLIM, two ecosystem/tissue models viz. MBLGEM and CENTURY Forest and the global model TEM. The review revealed a multitude of differences with respect to the model structure, the incorporation of particular processes and the coupling with the abiotic environment. We gave an assessment to what kind of questions the models can be best applied and how well they are suited for studying the response of the Ccycle under climate change. In this context organic C in litter and humus play a keyrole. The number of compartments and the pathways of Cflows influence both the transient phase and equilibrium of the system, a fact that has been recognized before (Harvey, 1989), but has not been investigated systematically for any of the models. Hence, the multitude of aggregation levels used to represent detritus and the variety of decomposition formulations used in the models may result in inconsistencies of the simulation results. Similarly, the control of ecoprocesses via abiotic factors differs among the models. They use distinct abiotic quantities and different mathematical parametrizations, hereby affecting the systems response in a changing environment substantially, even if this is not the case for present conditions. Given the differences in experimental frames of published simulations it was not possible to trace back behavior deviations to particular model formulations. In order to make consistent projections of the Ccycle s response in forests in a changing climate there remains an urgent need to analyze the models from a structural point of view based on quantitative model comparisons under welldefined conditions.
Permanent link
Publication status
published
External links
Editor
Book title
Journal / series
Volume
19
Pages / Article No.
Publisher
Terrestrial Systems Ecology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich
Event
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Soil; Modeling; Carbon budget; Climatic change; Forests
Organisational unit
02350 - Dep. Umweltsystemwissenschaften / Dep. of Environmental Systems Science
Notes
Funding
Related publications and datasets
Is previous version of: 10.2307/2845978Is documented by: https://www.sysecol.ethz.ch/publications/reports/#19