error
Kurzer Serviceunterbruch am Donnerstag, 12. März 2026, 12 bis 13 Uhr. Sie können in diesem Zeitraum keine neuen Dokumente hochladen oder bestehende Einträge bearbeiten. Das Login wird in diesem Zeitraum deaktiviert. Grund: Wartungsarbeiten // Short service interruption on Thursday, March 12, 2026, 12.00 – 13.00. During this time, you won’t be able to upload new documents or edit existing records. The login will be deactivated during this time. Reason: maintenance work
 

Monitoring of breathing motion in image-guided PBS proton therapy: comparative analysis of optical and electromagnetic technologies


Loading...

Date

2017

Publication Type

Journal Article

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric

Data

Abstract

Background Motion monitoring is essential when treating non-static tumours with pencil beam scanned protons. 4D medical imaging typically relies on the detected body surface displacement, considered as a surrogate of the patient's anatomical changes, a concept similarly applied by most motion mitigation techniques. In this study, we investigate benefits and pitfalls of optical and electromagnetic tracking, key technologies for non-invasive surface motion monitoring, in the specific environment of image-guided, gantry-based proton therapy. Methods Polaris SPECTRA optical tracking system and the Aurora V3 electromagnetic tracking system from Northern Digital Inc. (NDI, Waterloo, CA) have been compared both technically, by measuring tracking errors and system latencies under laboratory conditions, and clinically, by assessing their practicalities and sensitivities when used with imaging devices and PBS treatment gantries. Additionally, we investigated the impact of using different surrogate signals, from different systems, on the reconstructed 4D CT images. Results Even though in controlled laboratory conditions both technologies allow for the localization of static fiducials with sub-millimetre jitter and low latency (31.6 ± 1 msec worst case), significant dynamic and environmental distortions limit the potential of the electromagnetic approach in a clinical setting. The measurement error in case of close proximity to a CT scanner is up to 10.5 mm and precludes its use for the monitoring of respiratory motion during 4DCT acquisitions. Similarly, the motion of the treatment gantry distorts up to 22 mm the tracking result. Conclusions Despite the line of sight requirement, the optical solution offers the best potential, being the most robust against environmental factors and providing the highest spatial accuracy. The significant difference in the temporal location of the reconstructed phase points is used to speculate on the need to apply the same monitoring system for imaging and treatment to ensure the consistency of detected phases.

Publication status

published

Editor

Book title

Volume

12

Pages / Article No.

63

Publisher

BioMed Central

Event

Edition / version

Methods

Software

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

Respiratory motion; Optical tracking; Electromagnetic tracking; Proton therapy; Gantry; CT imaging

Organisational unit

Notes

Funding

Related publications and datasets