error
Kurzer Serviceunterbruch am Montag, 8. Dezember 2025, 12 bis 13 Uhr. Sie können in diesem Zeitraum keine neuen Dokumente hochladen oder bestehende Einträge bearbeiten. Das Login wird in diesem Zeitraum deaktiviert. Grund: Wartungsarbeiten // Short service interruption on Monday, December 8, 2025, 12.00 – 13.00. During this time, you won’t be able to upload new documents or edit existing records. The login will be deactivated during this time. Reason: maintenance work
 

Pandemic, informality, and vulnerability

Impact of COVID-19 on livelihoods in India


Date

2020-06

Publication Type

Working Paper

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric

Data

Abstract

We analyze findings from a large-scale survey of around 5000 respondents across 12 states of India to study the impact of COVID-19 pandemic containment measures (lockdown) on employment, livelihoods, food security and access to relief measures. We find a massive increase in unemployment, an equally dramatic fall in earnings among informal workers, large increases in food insecurity, depletion of savings and patchy coverage of relief measures. Two-thirds of our respondents lost work. The few informal workers who were still employed during the lockdown experienced more than a fifty percent drop in their earnings. Even among regular wage workers, half received either no salary or reduced salary during the lockdown. Almost eighty percent of surveyed households experienced a reduction in their food intake and a similar percentage of urban households did not have enough money to pay next month's rent. We also use a set of logistic regressions to identify how employment loss and food intake varies with individual and householdlevel characteristics. We find that migrants and urban Muslims are significantly worse off with respect to employment and food security. Among employment categories, self-employed workers were more food secure. The Public Distribution System (PDS) system was seen to have the widest reach among social security measures. However, even under PDS, 16 percent of vulnerable urban households did not have access to government rations. Further, half of the respondents reported not receiving any cash transfers (state or central). We conclude that much more is needed in the way of direct fiscal support that has been announced thus far by state and central governments in India.

Publication status

published

External links

Editor

Book title

Volume

2020-01

Pages / Article No.

Publisher

Azim Premji University, Centre for Sustainable Employment

Event

Edition / version

Methods

Software

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

Organisational unit

03808 - Günther, Isabel / Günther, Isabel check_circle

Notes

Funding