The (still) mysterious case of agricultural protectionism
METADATA ONLY
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
2021
Publication Type
Journal Article
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
METADATA ONLY
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
Existing research demonstrates why farmers demand subsidies, but remains ambiguous as to why consumers/taxpayers support or rather do not oppose such subsidies. We approach this puzzle from two angles: how sensitive are citizens to cost implications of agricultural subsidies, and what is their “value function” with respect to agricultural policy? We argue that farm subsidies, besides benefiting farmers, promise to generate an array of non-market goods that serve various interests in society and thus receive strong support overall. To test our argument, we conducted conjoint survey experiments in two countries: Switzerland and the United States. Our results show that while cost implications only marginally reduce support for subsidies, support is positively affected by the allocation of subsidies to various policy goals, such as guaranteeing food security and enhancing animal welfare. These findings suggest that individual-level support for agricultural subsidies does not result from a lack of information, but reflect genuine appreciation of the perceived multi-functionality of agricultural subsidies. © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Permanent link
Publication status
published
External links
Editor
Book title
Journal / series
Volume
47 (3)
Pages / Article No.
391 - 416
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Event
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Agricultural protectionism; collective action theory; multi-functionality of agriculture; conjoint survey experiment; public opinion
Organisational unit
03446 - Bernauer, Thomas / Bernauer, Thomas