The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors
OPEN ACCESS
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
2024-06-04
Publication Type
Journal Article
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
OPEN ACCESS
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
The introduction of large public legal datasets has brought about a renaissance in legal NLP. Many of these datasets are composed of legal judgments—the product of judges deciding cases. Since ML algorithms learn to model the data they are trained on, several legal NLP models are models of judges. While some have argued for the automation of judges, in this position piece, we argue that automating the role of the judge raises difficult ethical challenges, in particular for common law legal systems. Our argument follows from the social role of the judge in actively shaping the law, rather than merely applying it. Since current NLP models are too far away from having the facilities necessary for this task, they should not be used to automate judges. Furthermore, even in the case that the models could achieve human-level capabilities, there would still be remaining ethical concerns inherent in the automation of the legal process.
Permanent link
Publication status
published
External links
Editor
Book title
Volume
12
Pages / Article No.
700 - 720
Publisher
MIT Press
Event
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Organisational unit
09682 - Cotterell, Ryan / Cotterell, Ryan