A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence
OPEN ACCESS
Author / Producer
Date
2017-03-17
Publication Type
Journal Article
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
OPEN ACCESS
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
Uncertainties of climate projections are routinely assessed by considering simulations from different models. Observations are used to evaluate models, yet there is a debate about whether and how to explicitly weight model projections by agreement with observations. Here we present a straightforward weighting scheme that accounts both for the large differences in model performance and for model interdependencies, and we test reliability in a perfect model setup. We provide weighted multimodel projections of Arctic sea ice and temperature as a case study to demonstrate that, for some questions at least, it is meaningless to treat all models equally. The constrained ensemble shows reduced spread and a more rapid sea ice decline than the unweighted ensemble. We argue that the growing number of models with different characteristics and considerable interdependence finally justifies abandoning strict model democracy, and we provide guidance on when and how this can be achieved robustly.
Permanent link
Publication status
published
External links
Editor
Book title
Journal / series
Volume
44 (4)
Pages / Article No.
1909 - 1918
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
Event
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Organisational unit
03777 - Knutti, Reto / Knutti, Reto
Notes
Funding
641816 - Coordinated Research in Earth Systems and Climate: Experiments, kNowledge, Dissemination and Outreach (SBFI)