Redshift requirements for cosmic shear with intrinsic alignment
OPEN ACCESS
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
2023-01
Publication Type
Journal Article
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
OPEN ACCESS
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
Intrinsic alignment (IA) modelling and photometric redshift estimation are two of the main sources of systematic uncertainty in weak lensing surveys. We investigate the impact of redshift errors and their interplay with different IA models. Generally, errors on the mean δz and on the width σz of the redshift bins can both lead to biases in cosmological constraints. We find that such biases can, however, only be partially resolved by marginalizing over δz and σz . For Stage-III surveys, δz and σz cannot be well constrained due to limited statistics. The resulting biases are thus sensitive to prior volume effects. For Stage-IV surveys, we observe that marginalizing over the redshift parameters has an impact and reduces the bias. We derive requirements on the uncertainty of σz and δz for both Stage-III and Stage-IV surveys. We assume that the redshift systematic errors on S 8 should be less than half of the statistical errors, and the median bias should be smaller than 0.25σ. We find that the uncertainty on δz has to be ≲ 0.025 for the NLA IA model with a Stage-III survey. We find no requirement threshold for σz since the requirements are met even for our maximum prior width of 0.3. For the TATT IA model, the uncertainty on δz has to be ≲ 0.02 and the uncertainty on σz has to be ≲ 0.2. Current redshift precision of Stage-III surveys is therefore high enough to meet these requirements. For Stage-IV surveys, systematic effects will be more important due to the higher statistical precision. In this case, the uncertainty on δz has to be ≲ 0.005 and the uncertainty on σz should be ≲ 0.1, with no significant dependence on the IA model. This required high precision will be a challenge for the redshift calibration of these future surveys. Finally, we investigate whether the interplay between redshift systematics and IA modelling can explain the S 8-tension between cosmic shear results and CMB measurements. We find that this is unlikely to explain the current S 8-tension. The code that was used to conduct this analysis is publicly available.[refrigerator: https://cosmo-gitlab.phys.ethz.ch/cosmo_public/refrigerator.]
Permanent link
Publication status
published
External links
Editor
Book title
Journal / series
Volume
2023 (1)
Pages / Article No.
33
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Event
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Weak gravitational lensing; Cosmological parameters from LSS
Organisational unit
03928 - Refregier, Alexandre / Refregier, Alexandre