error
Kurzer Serviceunterbruch am Donnerstag, 12. März 2026, 12 bis 13 Uhr. Sie können in diesem Zeitraum keine neuen Dokumente hochladen oder bestehende Einträge bearbeiten. Das Login wird in diesem Zeitraum deaktiviert. Grund: Wartungsarbeiten // Short service interruption on Thursday, March 12, 2026, 12.00 – 13.00. During this time, you won’t be able to upload new documents or edit existing records. The login will be deactivated during this time. Reason: maintenance work
 

Drift versus selection as drivers of phenotypic divergence at small spatial scales: The case of Belgjarskógur threespine stickleback


Loading...

Date

2019-07

Publication Type

Journal Article

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric

Data

Abstract

Divergence in phenotypic traits is facilitated by a combination of natural selection, phenotypic plasticity, gene flow, and genetic drift, whereby the role of drift is expected to be particularly important in small and isolated populations. Separating the components of phenotypic divergence is notoriously difficult, particularly for multivariate phenotypes. Here, we assessed phenotypic divergence of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) across 19 semi‐interconnected ponds within a small geographic region (~7.5 km2) using comparisons of multivariate phenotypic divergence (PST), neutral genetic (FST), and environmental (EST) variation. We found phenotypic divergence across the ponds in a suite of functionally relevant phenotypic traits, including feeding, defense, and swimming traits, and body shape (geometric morphometric). Comparisons of PSTs with FSTs suggest that phenotypic divergence is predominantly driven by neutral processes or stabilizing selection, whereas phenotypic divergence in defensive traits is in accordance with divergent selection. Comparisons of population pairwise PSTs with ESTs suggest that phenotypic divergence in swimming traits is correlated with prey availability, whereas there were no clear associations between phenotypic divergence and environmental difference in the other phenotypic groups. Overall, our results suggest that phenotypic divergence of these small populations at small geographic scales is largely driven by neutral processes (gene flow, drift), although environmental determinants (natural selection or phenotypic plasticity) may play a role.

Publication status

published

Editor

Book title

Volume

9 (14)

Pages / Article No.

8133 - 8145

Publisher

Wiley

Event

Edition / version

Methods

Software

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

adaptive divergence; FST; multivariate phenotype; plasticity; PST; stickleback

Organisational unit

03705 - Jokela, Jukka / Jokela, Jukka check_circle

Notes

Funding

Related publications and datasets