Advocating for the credibility revolution
METADATA ONLY
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
2020-03-20
Publication Type
Journal Article
ETH Bibliography
no
Citations
Altmetric
METADATA ONLY
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
The credibility of psychological science has been questioned recently, due to low levels of reproducibility and the routine use of inadequate research practices (Chambers, 2017; Open Science Collaboration, 2015; Simmons, Nelson, & Simonsohn, 2011). In response, wide-ranging reform to scientific practice has been proposed (e.g., Munafò et al., 2017), which has been dubbed a “credibility revolution” (Vazire, 2018). My aim here is to advocate why and how we should embrace such reform, and discuss the likely implications.
Permanent link
Publication status
published
External links
Editor
Book title
Journal / series
Volume
5
Pages / Article No.
70 - 73
Publisher
The British Psychological Society
Event
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Organisational unit
09800 - Cross, Emily S. / Cross, Emily S.