Design issues for compressed air energy storage in sealed underground cavities

Open access
Date
2016-06Type
- Journal Article
Citations
Cited 25 times in
Web of Science
Cited 31 times in
Scopus
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics
Abstract
Compressed air energy storage (CAES) systems represent a new technology for storing very large amount of energy. A peculiarity of the systems is that gas must be stored under a high pressure (p = 10–30 MPa). A lined rock cavern (LRC) in the form of a tunnel or shaft can be used within this pressure range. The rock mass surrounding the opening resists the internal pressure and the lining ensures gas tightness. The present paper investigates the key aspects of technical feasibility of shallow LRC tunnels or shafts under a wide range of geotechnical conditions. Results show that the safety with respect to uplift failure of the rock mass is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for assessing feasibility. The deformation of the rock mass should also be kept sufficiently small to preserve the integrity of the lining and, especially, its tightness. If the rock is not sufficiently stiff, buckling or fatigue failure of the steel lining becomes more decisive when evaluating the feasible operating air pressure. The design of the concrete plug that seals the compressed air stored in the container is another demanding task. Numerical analyses indicate that in most cases, the stability of the rock mass under the plug loading is not a decisive factor for plug design. Show more
Permanent link
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000109257Publication status
publishedExternal links
Journal / series
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringVolume
Pages / Article No.
Publisher
ElsevierSubject
Compressed air energy storage (CAES); Tunnels; Lining; Concrete plug; Feasibility assessmentOrganisational unit
03655 - Anagnostou, Georgios / Anagnostou, Georgios
02607 - Institut für Geotechnik / Institute for Geotechnical Engineering
More
Show all metadata
Citations
Cited 25 times in
Web of Science
Cited 31 times in
Scopus
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics