Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Mauder, Matthias
dc.contributor.author
Foken, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Clement, Robert J.
dc.contributor.author
Elbers, Jan A.
dc.contributor.author
Eugster, Werner
dc.contributor.author
Grünwald, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Heusinkveld, Bert G.
dc.contributor.author
Kolle, Olaf
dc.date.accessioned
2019-05-07T11:05:36Z
dc.date.available
2017-06-08T21:14:19Z
dc.date.available
2019-05-07T11:05:36Z
dc.date.issued
2008
dc.identifier.other
10.5194/bg-5-451-2008
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/14034
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000014034
dc.description.abstract
As part of the quality assurance and quality control activities within the CarboEurope-IP network, a comparison of eddy-covariance software was conducted. For four five-day datasets, CO2 flux estimates were calculated by seven commonly used software packages to assess the uncertainty of CO2 flux estimates due to differences in post-processing. The datasets originated from different sites representing different commonly applied instrumentation and different canopy structures to cover a wide range of realistic conditions. Data preparation, coordinate rotation and the implementation of the correction for high frequency spectral losses were identified as crucial processing steps leading to significant discrepancies in the CO2 flux results. The overall comparison indicated a good although not yet perfect agreement among the different software within 5–10% difference for 30-min CO2 flux values. Conceptually different ideas about the selection and application of processing steps were a main reason for the differences in the CO2 flux estimates observed. A balance should be aspired between scientific freedom on the one hand, in order to advance methodical issues, and standardisation of procedures on the other hand, in order to obtain comparable fluxes for multi-site synthesis studies.
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Copernicus
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.title
Quality control of CarboEurope flux data: Part 2: Inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
dc.date.published
2008-03-26
ethz.journal.title
Biogeosciences
ethz.journal.volume
5
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
2
en_US
ethz.pages.start
451
en_US
ethz.pages.end
462
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.publication.place
Göttingen
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.leitzahl
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02350 - Dep. Umweltsystemwissenschaften / Dep. of Environmental Systems Science::02703 - Institut für Agrarwissenschaften / Institute of Agricultural Sciences::03648 - Buchmann, Nina / Buchmann, Nina
en_US
ethz.leitzahl.certified
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02350 - Dep. Umweltsystemwissenschaften / Dep. of Environmental Systems Science::02703 - Institut für Agrarwissenschaften / Institute of Agricultural Sciences::03648 - Buchmann, Nina / Buchmann, Nina
ethz.date.deposited
2017-06-08T21:14:33Z
ethz.source
ECIT
ethz.identifier.importid
imp59364c369fbad37853
ethz.ecitpid
pub:25571
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2017-07-18T10:09:13Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2019-05-07T11:05:47Z
ethz.rosetta.exportRequired
true
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Quality%20control%20of%20CarboEurope%20flux%20data:%20Part%202:%20Inter-comparison%20of%20eddy-covariance%20software&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=462&rft.au=Mauder,%20Matthias&Foken,%20Thomas&Clement,%20Robert%20J.&Elbers,%20Jan%20A.&Eugster,%20Werner&rft.genre=article&
 Search via SFX

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Publication type

Show simple item record