Open access
Date
2018-08Type
- Review Article
Abstract
In light of the recent rise of destruction and looting of cultural property, a need for formalized heritage protection has arisen. Increasingly popular in the debate has become the instrument of international assistance known as “safe havens.” These temporary refuges for at-risk cultural goods in a third country have recently been implemented by Switzerland, France, the United States, and the Association of Art Museum Directors. We assess the contributions and shortcomings of these four regimes using a comparative approach. Mainly, we find that, despite variations in their scope and structure, none of the models accounts entirely for today’s major difficulties in protecting endangered cultural properties. We draw recommendations for future safe haven states against the backdrop of the existing models and hope to see the instrument used in practice as a way to safely isolate cultural property from destructive conflicts. Show more
Permanent link
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000319863Publication status
publishedExternal links
Journal / series
International Journal of Cultural PropertyVolume
Pages / Article No.
Publisher
Cambridge University PressSubject
Safe havens; cultural heritage protection; comparative lawOrganisational unit
03795 - Bechtold, Stefan / Bechtold, Stefan
Notes
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.More
Show all metadata