Open access
Date
2019Type
- Working Paper
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics
Abstract
Mobility as a Service (MaaS) seeks to integrate emerging shared mobility modes with existing public transportation (PT). Decisive to its uptake will be attractive subscription plans that cater for heterogeneous mobility needs. Research on willingness to pay for such plans has commenced, yet remains divided on a central question: how much to include of which mode, and how? Complementing previous research building on stated preference data, we use revealed preference data to analyze the viability of different subscription plan components. We find that PT season tickets are viable for 83% of all respondents. In contrast to many current MaaS pilots, car-, bike-sharing and taxi use remains too infrequent to include as recurring credit in MaaS plans. Rather, pay-as-you-go is the economically more sensible option for consumers. This research therefore challenges the idea of all-inclusive mobility flat rates and suggests a more modular design. Show more
Permanent link
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000356141Publication status
publishedJournal / series
Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und RaumplanungVolume
Publisher
IVT, ETH ZurichSubject
Mobility as a Service (MaaS); Service bundling; Multimodal transportation plansOrganisational unit
03521 - Axhausen, Kay W. (emeritus) / Axhausen, Kay W. (emeritus)
02655 - Netzwerk Stadt u. Landschaft ARCH u BAUG / Network City and Landscape ARCH and BAUG
Related publications and datasets
Is previous version of: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000371119
Is previous version of: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000409243
More
Show all metadata
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics