Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Che, Shuai
dc.contributor.author
Breitenmoser, David
dc.contributor.author
Infimovskiy, Yuriy Y.
dc.contributor.author
Manera, Annalisa
dc.contributor.author
Petrov, Victor
dc.date.accessioned
2020-06-02T14:07:58Z
dc.date.available
2020-05-30T03:15:40Z
dc.date.available
2020-06-02T14:07:58Z
dc.date.issued
2020-05
dc.identifier.issn
2296-598X
dc.identifier.other
10.3389/fenrg.2020.00065
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/417468
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000417468
dc.description.abstract
The behavior of two-phase flow and corresponding flow regimes in helical tubes significantly differ when compared to two-phase flows in straight tubes due to centrifugal and torsion effects. In order to gain physical insight and gather data for validating computational models, a large number of experiments were performed on a helical coil experimental setup operated with a mixture of water and air. The experimental data were used to assess the predictive capabilities of current two-phase Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models based on the Volume of Fluid (VOF) approach. In the present paper, a comparison of the CFD simulation results with the high-resolution experimental data is discussed, with special emphasis on two-phase pressure drops and void fraction distributions. It is shown that the CFD VOF model is able to correctly capture the occurrence of five flow regimes observed in the experiments, namely bubbly flow, plug flow, slug flow, slug-annular flow, and annular flow. However, a good quantitative agreement for pressure drops and void fraction distributions is found in slug flow and slug-annular flow regimes only. The good agreement found only in a limited range of flow regimes demonstrates that there is not a single set of best-practice guidelines for CFD VOF models that can be applied across a wide range of two-phase flow regimes. Also, there is not a single mesh that can be used to simulate all of the flow regimes and a case-specific mesh and time-step convergence study is needed for each individual flow regime. In the current study, optimal mesh size and time step were obtained for a slug flow test case. Hence, good agreement was obtained only for similar flow regimes, leading to significant disagreement with experimental data for test cases with substantially different flow patterns.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
CFD
en_US
dc.subject
VOF
en_US
dc.subject
helical coil
en_US
dc.subject
void fraction
en_US
dc.subject
two-phase pressure drop
en_US
dc.title
CFD Simulation of Two-Phase Flows in Helical Coils
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2020-05-07
ethz.journal.title
Frontiers in Energy Research
ethz.journal.volume
8
en_US
ethz.journal.abbreviated
Front. Energy Res.
ethz.pages.start
65
en_US
ethz.size
15 p.
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
Lausanne
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.leitzahl
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02130 - Dep. Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik / Dep. of Mechanical and Process Eng.::02668 - Inst. f. Energie- und Verfahrenstechnik / Inst. Energy and Process Engineering::09733 - Manera, Annalisa / Manera, Annalisa
ethz.leitzahl.certified
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02130 - Dep. Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik / Dep. of Mechanical and Process Eng.::02668 - Inst. f. Energie- und Verfahrenstechnik / Inst. Energy and Process Engineering::09733 - Manera, Annalisa / Manera, Annalisa
ethz.date.deposited
2020-05-30T03:15:48Z
ethz.source
SCOPUS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2020-06-02T14:08:09Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2024-02-02T10:59:29Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=CFD%20Simulation%20of%20Two-Phase%20Flows%20in%20Helical%20Coils&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20Energy%20Research&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=65&rft.issn=2296-598X&rft.au=Che,%20Shuai&Breitenmoser,%20David&Infimovskiy,%20Yuriy%20Y.&Manera,%20Annalisa&Petrov,%20Victor&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00065&
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Publication type

Show simple item record