Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Narimissa, Esmaeil
dc.contributor.author
Schweizer, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Wagner, Manfred H.
dc.date.accessioned
2020-06-29T12:54:05Z
dc.date.available
2020-06-18T05:26:32Z
dc.date.available
2020-06-18T13:24:15Z
dc.date.available
2020-06-29T12:54:05Z
dc.date.issued
2020-07
dc.identifier.issn
0035-4511
dc.identifier.issn
1435-1528
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/s00397-020-01215-7
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/420943
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000420943
dc.description.abstract
We analyse shear stress and normal stress data obtained by cone-partitioned-plate (CPP) shear rheometry in recent years. The data sets of Schweizer et al. (Rheol. Acta 47, 943–957, 2008) and Costanzo et al. (Macromolecules 49, 3925–3935, 2016; & Fluids 4, 28, 2019) on nearly monodisperse polystyrene melts and solutions are considered to be among the most reliable shear data available. The Doi-Edwards independent alignment (DEIA) model (J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Transactions 2: Molecular and Chemical Physics 74, 1802–1832, 1978a,b) allows for quantitative description of the steady-state values of shear viscosity η(γ˙) and first normal stress coefficient ψ1(γ˙), while it underpredicts the stress overshoot of the stress growth coefficient of the shear stress, η+(t), and fails in predicting a stress overshoot of the stress growth coefficient of first normal stress difference, ψ+1(t). On the other hand, the extended interchain pressure (EIP) model (J. Rheol. 64, 95–110, 2020) provides an excellent prediction of the stress overshoots of both shear stress and first normal stress difference, while overpredicting the steady-state shear viscosity and the first normal stress coefficient. We demonstrate that the shear stress overshoot is the result of a combination of orientational stress overshoot and stretch overshoot, while the normal stress overshoot depends solely on the overshoot of the stretch. Based on these considerations, we propose a novel constitutive approach consisting of a combination of the DEIA and the EIP model, and predictions of this approach are found to be in quantitative agreement with the data sets of Schweizer et al. and Costanzo et al. within experimental accuracy.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Springer
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Shear rheometry
en_US
dc.subject
Cone-partitioned-plate
en_US
dc.subject
Doi-Edwards model
en_US
dc.subject
MSF model
en_US
dc.subject
Shear stress overshoot
en_US
dc.subject
Normal stress overshoot
en_US
dc.subject
Polystyrene melts and solutions
en_US
dc.title
A constitutive analysis of nonlinear shear flow
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2020-06-03
ethz.journal.title
Rheologica Acta
ethz.journal.volume
59
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
7
en_US
ethz.journal.abbreviated
Rheol. acta
ethz.pages.start
487
en_US
ethz.pages.end
506
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
Berlin
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2020-06-18T05:26:36Z
ethz.source
WOS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2020-06-29T12:54:17Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2021-02-15T15:10:11Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=A%20constitutive%20analysis%20of%20nonlinear%20shear%20flow&rft.jtitle=Rheologica%20Acta&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=506&rft.issn=0035-4511&1435-1528&rft.au=Narimissa,%20Esmaeil&Schweizer,%20Thomas&Wagner,%20Manfred%20H.&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00397-020-01215-7&
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Publication type

Show simple item record