Tailored Algorithms for the Detection of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height from Common Automatic Lidars and Ceilometers (ALC)
dc.contributor.author
Kotthaus, Simone
dc.contributor.author
Haeffelin, Martial
dc.contributor.author
Drouin, Marc-Antoine
dc.contributor.author
Dupont, Jean-Charles
dc.contributor.author
Grimmond, Sue
dc.contributor.author
Haefele, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Hervo, Maxime
dc.contributor.author
Poltera, Yann
dc.contributor.author
Wiegner, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned
2020-10-26T09:19:58Z
dc.date.available
2020-10-25T03:14:41Z
dc.date.available
2020-10-26T09:19:58Z
dc.date.issued
2020-10
dc.identifier.issn
2072-4292
dc.identifier.other
10.3390/rs12193259
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/447706
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000447706
dc.description.abstract
A detailed understanding of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) processes is key to improve forecasting of pollution dispersion and cloud dynamics in the context of future climate scenarios. International networks of automatic lidars and ceilometers (ALC) are gathering valuable data that allow for the height of the ABL and its sublayers to be derived in near real time. A new generation of advanced methods to automatically detect the ABL heights now exist. However, diversity in ALC models means these algorithms need to be tailored to instrument-specific capabilities. Here, the advanced algorithm STRATfinder is presented for application to high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) ALC observations, and results are compared to an automatic algorithm designed for low-SNR measurements (CABAM). The two algorithms are evaluated for application in an operational network setting. Results indicate that the ABL heights derived from low-SNR ALC have increased uncertainty during daytime deep convection, while high-SNR observations can have slightly reduced capabilities in detecting shallow nocturnal layers. Agreement between the ALC-based methods is similar when either is compared to the ABL heights derived from temperature profile data. The two independent methods describe very similar average diurnal and seasonal variations. Hence, high-quality products of ABL heights may soon become possible at national and continental scales.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
MDPI
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
boundary layer height
en_US
dc.subject
lidar
en_US
dc.subject
ceilometer
en_US
dc.subject
ALC network
en_US
dc.subject
E-PROFILE
en_US
dc.title
Tailored Algorithms for the Detection of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height from Common Automatic Lidars and Ceilometers (ALC)
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2020-10-07
ethz.journal.title
Remote Sensing
ethz.journal.volume
12
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
19
en_US
ethz.journal.abbreviated
Remote Sens.
ethz.pages.start
3259
en_US
ethz.size
23 p.
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2020-10-25T03:14:46Z
ethz.source
SCOPUS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2020-10-26T09:20:12Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2022-03-29T03:49:08Z
ethz.rosetta.exportRequired
true
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Tailored%20Algorithms%20for%20the%20Detection%20of%20the%20Atmospheric%20Boundary%20Layer%20Height%20from%20Common%20Automatic%20Lidars%20and%20Ceilometers%20(ALC)&rft.jtitle=Remote%20Sensing&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=3259&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.au=Kotthaus,%20Simone&Haeffelin,%20Martial&Drouin,%20Marc-Antoine&Dupont,%20Jean-Charles&Grimmond,%20Sue&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs12193259&
Files in this item
Publication type
-
Journal Article [136365]