Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Hainc, Nicolin
dc.contributor.author
Federau, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Tyndall, Anthony
dc.contributor.author
Mittermeier, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Bink, Andrea
dc.contributor.author
Stippich, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
Schubert, Tilman
dc.date.accessioned
2020-10-30T09:06:08Z
dc.date.available
2020-10-29T04:54:33Z
dc.date.available
2020-10-30T09:06:08Z
dc.date.issued
2020-10
dc.identifier.issn
2573-8348
dc.identifier.other
10.1002/cnr2.1277
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/448485
dc.description.abstract
Background To visualize and assess brain metastases on magnetic resonance imaging, radiologists face an ever‐increasing pressure to perform faster and more efficiently. The usage of maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of contrast‐enhanced T1‐weighed (T1ce) magnetization‐prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MP‐RAGE) images proposes to increase reading efficiency by increasing lesion conspicuity while reducing in the number of images to be reviewed. Aim To assess if MIPs save reading time and achieve the same level of diagnostic accuracy as standard 1 mm T1ce images for the detection of brain metastases. Methods Forty‐four patients were included in this retrospective study. Axial reformations of T1ce MP‐RAGE (TR/TE = 2300/2.25 ms, resolution = 1 mm3) images were analyzed and post‐processed into 5 and 10 mm MIPs. Two readers evaluated the randomly assorted images and recorded reading time. Reading time differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test, and inter‐reader statistics were performed using Bland–Altman plots. Results About 22.5 61.2 s/study and 43.8 ± 159.9 s/study were saved using 5 and 10 mm MIPs, respectively. Combined average sensitivity was 92.0% for 5 mm MIPs and 86.3% for 10 mm MIPs compared to standard 1 mm axial slices, with an average rate of 0.98 and 0.57 false positives per study, respectively Conclusion While 5 mm and 10 mm T1ce MP‐RAGE MIPs showed a clinical benefit in reducing reading times for evaluation of brain metastases, they should be used in conjunction with standard 1 mm images for best sensitivity and specificity, a practice which possibly annuls their benefit. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Wiley
en_US
dc.subject
CNS
en_US
dc.subject
MR-imaging
en_US
dc.subject
Metastases
en_US
dc.title
Evaluation of the clinical utility of maximum intensity projections of 3D contrast‐enhanced, T1‐weighted imaging for the detection of brain metastases
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.date.published
2020-08-07
ethz.journal.title
Cancer Reports
ethz.journal.volume
3
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
5
en_US
ethz.journal.abbreviated
Cancer Rep
ethz.pages.start
e1277
en_US
ethz.size
6 p.
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
Hoboken, NJ
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2020-10-29T04:54:38Z
ethz.source
SCOPUS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Metadata only
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2020-10-30T09:06:18Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2023-02-06T20:37:13Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20clinical%20utility%20of%20maximum%20intensity%20projections%20of%203D%20contrast%E2%80%90enhanced,%20T1%E2%80%90weighted%20imaging%20for%20the%20&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20Reports&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e1277&rft.issn=2573-8348&rft.au=Hainc,%20Nicolin&Federau,%20Christian&Tyndall,%20Anthony&Mittermeier,%20Andreas&Bink,%20Andrea&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cnr2.1277&
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatOpen in viewer

There are no files associated with this item.

Publication type

Show simple item record