Abstract
Although a plethora of research articles on AI methods on COVID-19 medical imaging are published, their clinical value remains unclear. We conducted the largest systematic review of the literature addressing the utility of AI in imaging for COVID-19 patient care. By keyword searches on PubMed and preprint servers throughout 2020, we identified 463 manuscripts and performed a systematic meta-analysis to assess their technical merit and clinical relevance. Our analysis evidences a significant disparity between clinical and AI communities, in the focus on both imaging modalities (AI experts neglected CT and ultrasound, favoring X-ray) and performed tasks (71.9% of AI papers centered on diagnosis). The vast majority of manuscripts were found to be deficient regarding potential use in clinical practice, but 2.7% (n = 12) publications were assigned a high maturity level and are summarized in greater detail. We provide an itemized discussion of the challenges in developing clinically relevant AI solutions with recommendations and remedies. Show more
Permanent link
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000490430Publication status
publishedExternal links
Journal / series
PatternsVolume
Pages / Article No.
Publisher
ElsevierSubject
artificial intelligence; meta-review; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Chest X-Ray; Chest CT; chest ultrasound; machine learning; deep learning; PRISMA; SARS-CoV-2; medical imaging; digital healthcare; lung imagingMore
Show all metadata