Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Kolbe, Michaela
dc.contributor.author
Grande, Bastian
dc.contributor.author
Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale
dc.contributor.author
Seelandt, Julia Carolin
dc.date.accessioned
2023-03-08T09:27:41Z
dc.date.available
2022-08-13T05:56:32Z
dc.date.available
2022-08-19T11:22:15Z
dc.date.available
2023-03-08T09:27:41Z
dc.date.issued
2023-03
dc.identifier.issn
2044-5423
dc.identifier.issn
2044-5415
dc.identifier.other
10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014393
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/563549
dc.description.abstract
Background Debriefings help teams learn quickly and treat patients safely. However, many clinicians and educators report to struggle with leading debriefings. Little empirical knowledge on optimal debriefing processes is available. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential of specific types of debriefer communication to trigger participants’ reflection in debriefings. Methods In this prospective observational, microanalytic interaction analysis study, we observed clinicians while they participated in healthcare team debriefings following three high-risk anaesthetic scenarios during simulation-based team training. Using the video-recorded debriefings and INTERACT coding software, we applied timed, event-based coding with DE-CODE, a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions. We used lag sequential analysis to explore the relationship between what debriefers and participants said. We hypothesised that combining advocacy (ie, stating an observation followed by an opinion) with an open-ended question would be associated with participants’ verbalisation of a mental model as a particular form of reflection. Results The 50 debriefings with overall 114 participants had a mean duration of 49.35 min (SD=8.89 min) and included 18 486 behavioural transitions. We detected significant behavioural linkages from debriefers’ observation to debriefers’ opinion (z=9.85, p<0.001), from opinion to debriefers’ open-ended question (z=9.52, p<0.001) and from open-ended question to participants’ mental model (z=7.41, p<0.001), supporting our hypothesis. Furthermore, participants shared mental models after debriefers paraphrased their statements and asked specific questions but not after debriefers appreciated their actions without asking any follow-up questions. Participants also triggered reflection among themselves, particularly by sharing personal anecdotes. Conclusion When debriefers pair their observations and opinions with open-ended questions, paraphrase participants’ statements and ask specific questions, they help participants reflect during debriefings.
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
BMJ
en_US
dc.title
Helping healthcare teams to debrief effectively: associations of debriefers' actions and participants' reflections during team debriefings
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.date.published
2022-07-28
ethz.journal.title
BMJ Quality & Safety
ethz.journal.volume
32
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
3
en_US
ethz.journal.abbreviated
BMJ Qual Saf
ethz.pages.start
160
en_US
ethz.pages.end
172
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
London
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2022-08-13T05:57:13Z
ethz.source
WOS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Metadata only
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2023-03-08T09:27:42Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2023-03-08T09:27:42Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.atitle=Helping%20healthcare%20teams%20to%20debrief%20effectively:%20associations%20of%20debriefers'%20actions%20and%20participants'%20reflections%20during%20team%20debriefings&amp;rft.jtitle=BMJ%20Quality%20&%20Safety&amp;rft.date=2023-03&amp;rft.volume=32&amp;rft.issue=3&amp;rft.spage=160&amp;rft.epage=172&amp;rft.issn=2044-5423&amp;2044-5415&amp;rft.au=Kolbe,%20Michaela&amp;Grande,%20Bastian&amp;Lehmann-Willenbrock,%20Nale&amp;Seelandt,%20Julia%20Carolin&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014393&amp;
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatOpen in viewer

There are no files associated with this item.

Publication type

Show simple item record