Consumers’ meat commitment and the importance of animal welfare as agricultural policy goal
dc.contributor.author
Ammann, Jeanine
dc.contributor.author
Mack, Gabriele
dc.contributor.author
Irek, Judith
dc.contributor.author
Finger, Robert
dc.contributor.author
Benni, Nadja El
dc.date.accessioned
2023-10-09T11:59:09Z
dc.date.available
2023-10-09T11:41:49Z
dc.date.available
2023-10-09T11:59:09Z
dc.date.issued
2023-12
dc.identifier.issn
0950-3293
dc.identifier.issn
1873-6343
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105010
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/635600
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000635600
dc.description.abstract
Animal welfare is one of the key agricultural policy goals and is considered extremely important by consumers. With the increasing urgency for a sustainable and healthy dietary shift, it could be one of the key motivators for behaviour change. Therefore, we investigate how consumers perceive the importance of animal welfare not only as an agricultural policy goal but also in comparison to conflicting goals, such as domestic food production, farmers’ income, and consumer prices. We investigate how the weighing of animal welfare as an agricultural policy goal is related to individual behaviour (i.e. meat consumption), values and attitudes, such as meat commitment, the perceptions of farmers and the Ecological Welfare scale (which includes animal welfare and environment protection). Thus, we conducted an online survey in October 2022, recruiting a sample of 1542 participants (51.5% women) in equal parts from the German-, French-, and Italian-speaking parts of Switzerland. Participants were asked to evaluate the importance of increased animal welfare in three situations with the following conflicting policy goals: (1) increasing domestic food production, (2) reducing consumer food prices, and (3) increasing farm incomes. Regression analysis revealed that the influential predictors in all three models were similar. Being a woman, politically left leaning, and less committed to meat eating, having a more negative perception of farmers, and assigning more importance to ethical food consumption increased the probability of putting more weight on animal welfare in all three goal conflicts described above. The finding that participants who were more committed to meat eating tended to assign less importance to animal welfare when weighing the three conflicting agricultural policy goals is well-aligned with the current literature. Implications for agricultural policy are discussed.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Elsevier
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Domestic food production
en_US
dc.subject
Perception of farmers
en_US
dc.subject
Food prices
en_US
dc.subject
Meat commitment
en_US
dc.subject
Agricultural policy
en_US
dc.subject
New ecological paradigm
en_US
dc.title
Consumers’ meat commitment and the importance of animal welfare as agricultural policy goal
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2023-10-06
ethz.journal.title
Food Quality and Preference
ethz.journal.volume
112
en_US
ethz.journal.abbreviated
Food Qual. Prefer.
ethz.pages.start
105010
en_US
ethz.size
14 p.
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
Oxford
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.leitzahl
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02120 - Dep. Management, Technologie und Ökon. / Dep. of Management, Technology, and Ec.::09564 - Finger, Robert / Finger, Robert
en_US
ethz.leitzahl.certified
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02120 - Dep. Management, Technologie und Ökon. / Dep. of Management, Technology, and Ec.::09564 - Finger, Robert / Finger, Robert
en_US
ethz.relation.isSupplementedBy
10.3929/ethz-b-000647439
ethz.relation.isSupplementedBy
10.3929/ethz-b-000653869
ethz.date.deposited
2023-10-09T11:41:49Z
ethz.source
FORM
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2024-02-03T04:35:03Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2024-02-03T04:35:03Z
ethz.rosetta.exportRequired
true
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Consumers%E2%80%99%20meat%20commitment%20and%20the%20importance%20of%20animal%20welfare%20as%20agricultural%20policy%20goal&rft.jtitle=Food%20Quality%20and%20Preference&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=105010&rft.issn=0950-3293&1873-6343&rft.au=Ammann,%20Jeanine&Mack,%20Gabriele&Irek,%20Judith&Finger,%20Robert&Benni,%20Nadja%20El&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105010&
Files in this item
Publication type
-
Journal Article [132916]