Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Vallejo-Yagüe, Enriqueta
dc.contributor.author
Burkard, Theresa
dc.contributor.author
Finckh, Axel
dc.contributor.author
Burden, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned
2024-02-21T10:20:42Z
dc.date.available
2024-02-19T06:57:18Z
dc.date.available
2024-02-21T10:18:59Z
dc.date.available
2024-02-21T10:20:42Z
dc.date.issued
2024-01
dc.identifier.issn
2044-6055
dc.identifier.other
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074864
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/660124
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000660124
dc.description.abstract
Objectives Obesity is associated with lower treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In patients with obesity, abatacept was suggested as a preferable option to tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab, in patients with RA with obesity. Secondarily, we also investigated this in patients with overweight and normal weight for completeness. Design Observational cohort study. Setting Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (SCQM) registry (1997–2019). Participants Adult patients with RA from the SCQM registry who received etanercept, infliximab, abatacept or adalimumab as their first biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were classified based on their body mass index (BMI) at the start of that treatment in three cohorts: obese, overweight, normal weight. They were followed for a maximum of 1 year. Exposure The study exposure of interest was the patients’ first biological, particularly: etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary study outcome was remission within 12 months, defined as 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) <2.6. Missingness was addressed using confounder-adjusted response rate with attrition correction. Logistic regression was used to compare the effectiveness of etanercept, infliximab and abatacept versus adalimumab. Each BMI cohort was addressed and analysed separately. Results The study included 443 obese, 829 overweight and 1243 normal weight patients with RA. There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of DAS28-remission at ≤12 months for etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab, in any of the BMI cohorts. Conclusions No differences in DAS28-remission were found between the study drugs and adalimumab as first biologic in patients with RA, independently of the BMI cohort. We did not find evidence that treatment with abatacept increased the likelihood of remission compared with adalimumab among obese patients with RA.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
BMJ
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.title
Comparative effectiveness of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by body mass index: a cohort study in a Swiss registry
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2024-02-08
ethz.journal.title
BMJ Open
ethz.journal.volume
14
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
2
en_US
ethz.pages.start
e074864
en_US
ethz.size
9 p.
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.notes
On behalf of the clinicians and patients of the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Program
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2024-02-19T06:57:21Z
ethz.source
SCOPUS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2024-02-21T10:19:01Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2024-02-21T10:19:01Z
ethz.rosetta.exportRequired
true
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.atitle=Comparative%20effectiveness%20of%20biologics%20in%20patients%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis%20stratified%20by%20body%20mass%20index:%20a%20cohort%20study%20in%20a%20Swi&amp;rft.jtitle=BMJ%20Open&amp;rft.date=2024-01&amp;rft.volume=14&amp;rft.issue=2&amp;rft.spage=e074864&amp;rft.issn=2044-6055&amp;rft.au=Vallejo-Yag%C3%BCe,%20Enriqueta&amp;Burkard,%20Theresa&amp;Finckh,%20Axel&amp;Burden,%20Andrea&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074864&amp;
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Publication type

Show simple item record