Does model performance improve with complexity? A case study with three hydrological models
dc.contributor.author
Orth, René
dc.contributor.author
Staudinger, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Seneviratne, Sonia I.
dc.contributor.author
Seibert, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Zappa, Massimiliano
dc.date.accessioned
2023-05-31T08:25:38Z
dc.date.available
2017-06-11T16:08:15Z
dc.date.available
2023-05-31T08:25:38Z
dc.date.issued
2015-04
dc.identifier.issn
0022-1694
dc.identifier.issn
1879-2707
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.044
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/98091
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000098091
dc.description.abstract
In recent decades considerable progress has been made in climate model development. Following the massive increase in computational power, models became more sophisticated. At the same time also simple conceptual models have advanced. In this study we validate and compare three hydrological models of different complexity to investigate whether their performance varies accordingly. For this purpose we use runoff and also soil moisture measurements, which allow a truly independent validation, from several sites across Switzerland. The models are calibrated in similar ways with the same runoff data. Our results show that the more complex models HBV and PREVAH outperform the simple water balance model (SWBM) in case of runoff but not for soil moisture. Furthermore the most sophisticated PREVAH model shows an added value compared to the HBV model only in case of soil moisture. Focusing on extreme events we find generally improved performance of the SWBM during drought conditions and degraded agreement with observations during wet extremes. For the more complex models we find the opposite behavior, probably because they were primarily developed for prediction of runoff extremes. As expected given their complexity, HBV and PREVAH have more problems with over-fitting. All models show a tendency towards better performance in lower altitudes as opposed to (pre-) alpine sites. The results vary considerably across the investigated sites. In contrast, the different metrics we consider to estimate the agreement between models and observations lead to similar conclusions, indicating that the performance of the considered models is similar at different time scales as well as for anomalies and long-term means. We conclude that added complexity does not necessarily lead to improved performance of hydrological models, and that performance can vary greatly depending on the considered hydrological variable (e.g. runoff vs. soil moisture) or hydrological conditions (floods vs. droughts).
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Elsevier
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Hydrological model comparison
en_US
dc.subject
Runoff validation
en_US
dc.subject
Soil moisture validation
en_US
dc.subject
Simple conceptual model as benchmark
en_US
dc.title
Does model performance improve with complexity? A case study with three hydrological models
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2015-01-29
ethz.journal.title
Journal of Hydrology
ethz.journal.volume
523
en_US
ethz.journal.abbreviated
J. Hydrol.
ethz.pages.start
147
en_US
ethz.pages.end
159
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.identifier.nebis
000049368
ethz.publication.place
Amsterdam
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.leitzahl
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02350 - Dep. Umweltsystemwissenschaften / Dep. of Environmental Systems Science::02717 - Institut für Atmosphäre und Klima / Inst. Atmospheric and Climate Science::03778 - Seneviratne, Sonia / Seneviratne, Sonia
en_US
ethz.leitzahl.certified
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02350 - Dep. Umweltsystemwissenschaften / Dep. of Environmental Systems Science::02717 - Institut für Atmosphäre und Klima / Inst. Atmospheric and Climate Science::03778 - Seneviratne, Sonia / Seneviratne, Sonia
ethz.date.deposited
2017-06-11T16:08:51Z
ethz.source
ECIT
ethz.identifier.importid
imp593652ed2b5bf33338
ethz.ecitpid
pub:153391
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2017-07-18T11:12:35Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2024-02-02T23:50:10Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Does%20model%20performance%20improve%20with%20complexity?%20A%20case%20study%20with%20three%20hydrological%20models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Hydrology&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=523&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=159&rft.issn=0022-1694&1879-2707&rft.au=Orth,%20Ren%C3%A9&Staudinger,%20Maria&Seneviratne,%20Sonia%20I.&Seibert,%20Jan&Zappa,%20Massimiliano&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.044&
Dateien zu diesem Eintrag
Publikationstyp
-
Journal Article [130845]