error
Kurzer Serviceunterbruch am Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2026, 12 bis 13 Uhr. Sie können in diesem Zeitraum keine neuen Dokumente hochladen oder bestehende Einträge bearbeiten. Das Login wird in diesem Zeitraum deaktiviert. Grund: Wartungsarbeiten // Short service interruption on Thursday, January 15, 2026, 12.00 – 13.00. During this time, you won’t be able to upload new documents or edit existing records. The login will be deactivated during this time. Reason: maintenance work
 

Explicitly Tacit: Polanyi’s “Tacit Knowledge” in the architectural theory of Charney and Rowe


METADATA ONLY
Loading...

Author / Producer

Date

2022

Publication Type

Conference Paper

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric
METADATA ONLY

Data

Rights / License

Abstract

The scientist and philosopher Michael Polanyi coined the term “tacit knowledge” in 1958 to describe a type of unconscious, embodied and social knowledge that could not be explicitly taught through rules or rote-learning. He argued, instead, that some knowledge relied on practice, critique, socialisation and personal biography. In this sense, something like tacit knowledge has long played an important role in architectural education — where skill is acquired through (re)drawing, writing and model-making, reviewed by teachers and peers — even before Polanyi named it. Yet, for all the affinities between design education and tacit knowledge, Polanyi’s epistemology has rarely been directly addressed in architectural theory. This paper considers two exceptions in the writing and pedagogy of Melvin Charney and Colin Rowe in the 1970s. Both figures used Polanyi’s philosophy to propose alternatives to the “ultra” positions of Modernism. Charney argued that Quebecois vernacular architecture reflected a tacit, collective building culture that was inseparable from the embodied construction practices of craftspeople. This could not be made explicit in construction manuals or histories; students had to discover it through drawing and building themselves. Meanwhile, Rowe credited Polanyi’s Beyond Nihilism (1960) in the gestation of Collage City (1978, with Fred Koetter). Polanyi’s essay argued that individual freedom was important in making new discoveries, but that individuals still had a responsibility to go beyond themselves by conforming to collective norms and standards. This, too, found a parallel in Rowe and Koetter’s rejection of Modernist utopianism. At the same time, a close reading of these minor encounters reveals certain continuities and misalignments between Rowe and Charney’s interpretation and Polanyi’s own position as a prominent anti-Communist and contributor to early neoliberalism. Ultimately, this paper aims to clarify the role of tacit knowledge in the theory of these two architect/educators and, in doing so, simultaneously clarify the relationship between tacit knowledge and architectural pedagogy more broadly.

Publication status

published

Book title

Ultra: Positions and Polarities Beyond Crisis

Volume

38

Pages / Article No.

572 - 579

Publisher

Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand

Event

38th Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand (SAHANZ 2021)

Edition / version

Methods

Software

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

Tacit knowledge; Michael Polanyi; Charney Melvin; Row Colin; Epistemology; Craft; Architectural theory; Architectural history

Organisational unit

09643 - Avermaete, Tom / Avermaete, Tom check_circle
02655 - Netzwerk Stadt u. Landschaft ARCH u BAUG / Network City and Landscape ARCH and BAUG

Notes

Conference lecture held on November 13, 2021.

Funding

Related publications and datasets