Myoelectric or Force Control? A Comparative Study on a Soft Arm Exosuit


METADATA ONLY
Loading...

Date

2022-06

Publication Type

Journal Article

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric
METADATA ONLY

Data

Rights / License

Abstract

The intention-detection strategy used to drive an exosuit is fundamental to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of the device. Yet, current literature on wearable soft robotics lacks evidence on the comparative performance of different control approaches for online intention-detection. In the present work, we compare two different and complementary controllers on a wearable robotic suit, previously formulated and tested by our group; a model-based myoelectric control (myoprocessor), which estimates the joint torque from the activation of target muscles, and a force control that estimates human torques using an inverse dynamics model (dynamic arm). We test them on a cohort of healthy participants performing tasks replicating functional activities of daily living involving a wide range of dynamic movements. Our results suggest that both controllers are robust and effective in detecting human-motor interaction, and show comparable performance for augmenting muscular activity. In particular, the biceps brachii activity was reduced by up to 74% under the assistance of the dynamic arm and up to 47% under the myoprocessor, compared to a no-suit condition. However, the myoprocessor outperformed the dynamic arm in promptness and assistance during movements that involve high dynamics. The exosuit work normalized with respect to the overall work was $68.84 \pm 3.81\%$ when it was ran by the myoprocessor, compared to $45.29 \pm 7.71\%$ during the dynamic arm condition. The reliability and accuracy of motor intention detection strategies in wearable device is paramount for both the efficacy and acceptability of this technology. In this article, we offer a detailed analysis of the two most widely used control approaches, trying to highlight their intrinsic structural differences and to discuss their different and complementary performance.

Publication status

published

Editor

Book title

Volume

38 (3)

Pages / Article No.

1363 - 1379

Publisher

IEEE

Event

Edition / version

Methods

Software

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

Organisational unit

Notes

Funding

Related publications and datasets