Augmenting Printed School Atlases with Thematic 3D Maps
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
2020
Publication Type
Dataset
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
The CSV file contains answers and times of 58 participants who took part in a usability experiment on the comparison of printed maps vs. augmented reality maps in a school atlas. The file was used as source data for the statistical analysis. Please see details on materials, procedure, etc. in the corresponding article.
Permanent link
Publication status
External links
Editor
Contributors
Contact person: Schnürer, Raimund
Data collector : Dind, Cédric
Data collector: Schnürer, Raimund
Project leader: Schnürer, Raimund
Project member : Schalcher, Stefan
Project member : Tschudi, Pascal
Research group: Hurni, Lorenz
Book title
Journal / series
Volume
Pages / Article No.
Publisher
ETH Zurich
Event
Edition / version
1.0
Methods
Software
Unity
Geographic location
Date collected
2019
Date created
2019
Subject
Augmented reality; Atlases; 3D Cartography; Thematic maps; Education; Usability
Organisational unit
02648 - Inst. f. Kartografie und Geoinformation / Institute of Cartography&Geoinformation
Notes
The following abbreviations are used in the attached CSV file:
Examiner = person (C = Cédric; R = Raimund) who supervised the experiment.
StartTime = time (hh:mm:ss) the experiment started.
Setup = experimental setup including maps (1-4 = glacier extent; 5-8 = population density; 9-12 = holiday destination), devices (odd numbers = printed map + augmented map; even numbers = augmented map + printed map), and tasks and questions (1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10 = assessment task 1 + reflection question 1 + assessment task 2 + reflection question 2; 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12 = assessment task 1 + reflection question 1 + assessment task 3 + reflection question 3).
Age = age of the participant (note that three participants, who indicated that they were 18 years old, were actually 19 years old, and one participant, who indicated that he/she was 18 years old, was actually 20 years old).
Gender = gender (m = male; f = female) of the participant.
AnswerTask1 = answer given for the first assessment task.
TimeTask1 = time needed (in seconds) for the first assessment task.
AnswerQuestion1 = answer given for the first reflection question.
AnswerTask2 = answer given for the second assessment task.
TimeTask2 = time needed (in seconds) for the second assessment task.
AnswerQuestion2 = answer given for the second reflection question.
The fifth (C;10:34:59,...) and thirtieth (C;15:26:31,...) participant were excluded from the analysis so that tasks and questions per map are counter-balanced with respect to the order of used devices.