error
Kurzer Serviceunterbruch am Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2026, 12 bis 13 Uhr. Sie können in diesem Zeitraum keine neuen Dokumente hochladen oder bestehende Einträge bearbeiten. Das Login wird in diesem Zeitraum deaktiviert. Grund: Wartungsarbeiten // Short service interruption on Thursday, January 15, 2026, 12.00 – 13.00. During this time, you won’t be able to upload new documents or edit existing records. The login will be deactivated during this time. Reason: maintenance work
 

On the incongruence of genotype-phenotype and fitness landscapes


Loading...

Date

2022-09

Publication Type

Journal Article

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric

Data

Abstract

The mapping from genotype to phenotype to fitness typically involves multiple nonlinearities that can transform the effects of mutations. For example, mutations may contribute additively to a phenotype, but their effects on fitness may combine non-additively because selection favors a low or intermediate value of that phenotype. This can cause incongruence between the topographical properties of a fitness landscape and its underlying genotype-phenotype landscape. Yet, genotype-phenotype landscapes are often used as a proxy for fitness landscapes to study the dynamics and predictability of evolution. Here, we use theoretical models and empirical data on transcription factor-DNA interactions to systematically study the incongruence of genotype-phenotype and fitness landscapes when selection favors a low or intermediate phenotypic value. Using the theoretical models, we prove a number of fundamental results. For example, selection for low or intermediate phenotypic values does not change simple sign epistasis into reciprocal sign epistasis, implying that genotype-phenotype landscapes with only simple sign epistasis motifs will always give rise to single-peaked fitness landscapes under such selection. More broadly, we show that such selection tends to create fitness landscapes that are more rugged than the underlying genotype-phenotype landscape, but this increased ruggedness typically does not frustrate adaptive evolution because the local adaptive peaks in the fitness landscape tend to be nearly as tall as the global peak. Many of these results carry forward to the empirical genotype-phenotype landscapes, which may help to explain why low- and intermediate-affinity transcription factor-DNA interactions are so prevalent in eukaryotic gene regulation.

Publication status

published

Editor

Book title

Volume

18 (9)

Pages / Article No.

Publisher

PLOS

Event

Edition / version

Methods

Software

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

Sign epistasis; Natural selection; Transcription factors; Fitness epistasis; Reciprocal sign epistasis; DNA transcription; Point mutation; Gene expression

Organisational unit

09613 - Payne, Joshua (ehemalig) / Payne, Joshua (former) check_circle

Notes

Funding

170604 - Regulatory logic and the evolution of promoter complexity (SNF)
192541 - The deformability of empirical genotype-phenotype landscapes (SNF)

Related publications and datasets