Personal Property Servitudes Revisited


METADATA ONLY
Loading...

Date

2024-12

Publication Type

Journal Article

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric
METADATA ONLY

Data

Rights / License

Abstract

For nearly a century, scholars have debated whether personal property servitudes are valid. That is, can buyers and sellers of chattels write contracts that bind future purchasers? Buyers and sellers of real property can use covenants and equitable servitudes to bind future purchasers, but whether the same is true for personal property is controversial. This Article makes three main contributions to the debate. First, it sets out the first sustained argument in favor of personal property servitudes. Second, it explains how notice to subsequent purchasers can be provided using a combination of existing registries and new technologies, thus addressing the problem of information costs. Third, it suggests that potential problems with personal property servitudes— such as low-value, obsolete, and “orphan” servitudes—can be minimized by registration and renewal fees. These fees can be conceptualized as Pigouvian taxes ensuring that those who create and benefit from servitudes take into account the information costs they impose on third parties. More generally, this Article encourages a more nuanced discussion of personal property servitudes. We should move past arguments about whether chattel servitudes should be enforced or banned altogether. Instead, scholars should focus on institutions and doctrines that maximize the potential benefits of servitudes while minimizing their costs.

Publication status

published

External links

Editor

Book title

Volume

99

Pages / Article No.

345 - 395

Publisher

Tulane University, School of Law

Event

Edition / version

Methods

Software

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

Organisational unit

03795 - Bechtold, Stefan / Bechtold, Stefan check_circle

Notes

Funding

Related publications and datasets

Is new version of: 10.2139/ssrn.5097503