Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.author
Godde, Cécile M.
dc.contributor.author
de Boer, Imke J.M.
dc.contributor.author
zu Ermgassen, Erasmus
dc.contributor.author
Herrero, Mario
dc.contributor.author
van Middelaar, Corina E.
dc.contributor.author
Muller, Adrian
dc.contributor.author
Röös, Elin
dc.contributor.author
Schader, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Smith, Pete
dc.contributor.author
van Zanten, Hannah H.E.
dc.date.accessioned
2020-08-14T13:53:50Z
dc.date.available
2020-03-12T02:27:02Z
dc.date.available
2020-03-12T09:01:44Z
dc.date.available
2020-08-14T13:53:50Z
dc.date.issued
2020-08
dc.identifier.issn
0165-0009
dc.identifier.issn
1573-1480
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/s10584-020-02673-x
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/404467
dc.description.abstract
Grazing systems emit greenhouse gases, which can, under specific agro-ecological conditions, be partly or entirely offset by soil carbon sequestration. However, any sequestration is time-limited, reversible, and at a global level outweighed by emissions from grazing systems. Thus, grazing systems are globally a net contributor to climate change and the time scale of key processes needs to be factored into any mitigation efforts. Failing to do so leads to unrealistic expectations of soil carbon management in grazing systems as a mitigation strategy. Protecting the large carbon stocks in grazing lands is also essential in order to avoid further climate change from additional CO2 release. Despite the time-limited and reversible nature of soil carbon sequestration in grazing lands, sequestration should be promoted in cases where it delivers environmental and agronomic benefits as well as for its potential, particularly on degraded land, to increase the feasibility of limiting global warming to less than 2 or preferably 1.5 °C. Some peer-reviewed sequestration estimates are of a similar order of magnitude to other food systems mitigation options over a 10–20 years period, such as reducing food loss and waste by 15% or aligning diets with current health related dietary-recommendations. However, caution should be applied to such comparisons since mitigation estimates are associated with large uncertainties and will ultimately depend on the economic cost-benefit relation, feasibility of implementation and time frame considered.
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Springer
en_US
dc.subject
Grasslands
en_US
dc.subject
Soil carbon
en_US
dc.subject
Climate change
en_US
dc.subject
Livestock
en_US
dc.subject
Cattle
en_US
dc.subject
Greenhouse gases
en_US
dc.title
Soil carbon sequestration in grazing systems: managing expectations
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.date.published
2020-02-05
ethz.journal.title
Climatic Change
ethz.journal.volume
161
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
3
en_US
ethz.pages.start
385
en_US
ethz.pages.end
391
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
Dordrecht
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2020-03-12T02:27:06Z
ethz.source
WOS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Metadata only
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2020-08-14T13:54:42Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2023-02-06T20:22:08Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Soil%20carbon%20sequestration%20in%20grazing%20systems:%20managing%20expectations&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20Change&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=391&rft.issn=0165-0009&1573-1480&rft.au=Godde,%20C%C3%A9cile%20M.&de%20Boer,%20Imke%20J.M.&zu%20Ermgassen,%20Erasmus&Herrero,%20Mario&van%20Middelaar,%20Corina%20E.&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-020-02673-x&
 Printexemplar via ETH-Bibliothek suchen

Dateien zu diesem Eintrag

DateienGrößeFormatIm Viewer öffnen

Zu diesem Eintrag gibt es keine Dateien.

Publikationstyp

Zur Kurzanzeige