Revisiting the Optimality of Word Lengths
OPEN ACCESS
Loading...
Author / Producer
Date
2023-12
Publication Type
Conference Paper
ETH Bibliography
yes
Citations
Altmetric
OPEN ACCESS
Data
Rights / License
Abstract
Zipf (1935) posited that wordforms are optimized to minimize utterances’ communicative costs. Under the assumption that cost is given by an utterance’s length, he supported this claim by showing that words’ lengths are inversely correlated with their frequencies. Communicative cost, however, can be operationalized in different ways. Piantadosi et al. (2011) claim that cost should be measured as the distance between an utterance’s information rate and channel capacity, which we dub the channel capacity hypothesis (CCH) here. Following this logic, they then proposed that a word’s length should be proportional to the expected value of its surprisal (negative log-probability in context). In this work, we show that Piantadosi et al.’s derivation does not minimize CCH’s cost, but rather a lower bound, which we term CCH-lower. We propose a novel derivation, suggesting an improved way to minimize CCH’s cost. Under this method, we find that a language’s word lengths should instead be proportional to the surprisal’s expectation plus its variance-to-mean ratio. Experimentally, we compare these three communicative cost functions: Zipf’s, CCH-lower , and CCH. Across 13 languages and several experimental settings, we find that length is better predicted by frequency than either of the other hypotheses. In fact, when surprisal’s expectation, or expectation plus variance-to-mean ratio, is estimated using better language models, it leads to worse word length predictions. We take these results as evidence that Zipf’s longstanding hypothesis holds.
Permanent link
Publication status
published
Book title
Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Journal / series
Volume
Pages / Article No.
2240 - 2255
Publisher
Association for Computational Linguistics
Event
2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2023)
Edition / version
Methods
Software
Geographic location
Date collected
Date created
Subject
Organisational unit
09462 - Hofmann, Thomas / Hofmann, Thomas
09682 - Cotterell, Ryan / Cotterell, Ryan
Notes
Funding
Related publications and datasets
Is supplemented by: https://github.com/tpimentelms/optimality-of-word-lengths