Analysis of mobile phone design features affecting radiofrequency power absorbed in a human head phantom


METADATA ONLY
Loading...

Date

2013-09

Publication Type

Journal Article

ETH Bibliography

yes

Citations

Altmetric
METADATA ONLY

Data

Rights / License

Abstract

The US FCC mandates the testing of all mobile phones to demonstrate compliance with the rule requiring that the peak spatial SAR does not exceed the limit of 1.6 W/kg averaged over any 1 g of tissue. These test data, measured in phantoms with mobile phones operating at maximum antenna input power, permitted us to evaluate the variation in SARs across mobile phone design factors such as shape and antenna design, communication technology, and test date (over a 7‐year period). Descriptive statistical summaries calculated for 850MHz and 1900 MHz phones and ANOVA were used to evaluate the influence of the foregoing factors on SARs. Service technology accounted for the greatest variability in compliance test SARs that ranged from AMPS (highest) to CDMA, iDEN, TDMA, and GSM (lowest). However, the dominant factor for SARs during use is the time‐averaged antenna input power, which may be much less than the maximum power used in testing. This factor is largely defined by the communication system; e.g., the GSM phone average output can be higher than CDMA by a factor of 100. Phone shape, antenna type, and orientation of a phone were found to be significant but only on the order of up to a factor of 2 (3 dB). The SAR in the tilt position was significantly smaller than for touch. The side of the head did not affect SAR levels significantly. Among the remaining factors, external antennae produced greater SARs than internal ones, and brick and clamshell phones produced greater SARs than slide phones. Assuming phone design and usage patterns do not change significantly over time, we have developed a normalization procedure and formula that permits reliable prediction of the relative SAR between various communication systems. This approach can be applied to improve exposure assessment in epidemiological research. Bioelectromagnetics. 34:479–488. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Publication status

published

Editor

Book title

Volume

34 (6)

Pages / Article No.

479 - 488

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Event

Edition / version

Methods

Geographic location

Date collected

Date created

Subject

Specific absorption rate; Dosimetry; Epidemiology; Radiofrequency

Organisational unit

Notes

Received for review 19 August 2011, Accepted 14 January 2013, Published online 26 March 2013.

Funding Info about funding

Related publications and datasets