
Open access
Date
2019-02-09Type
- Working Paper
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics
Abstract
There is ample evidence that people are internally motivated to keep their promises.
However, it is unclear whether promises alone create a meaningful level of commitment
in many economically relevant situations where the stakes are high. In a between-
subject design, we ask subjects to imagine they observed as third parties a promisor
breaking her promise and could punish the promisor, at a cost to themselves, for her
behavior. Our results suggest that the motivations third parties have to punish promise
breakers have the same structure as the moral motivations of those deciding whether or
not to keep their promises. That is, the same moral reasons that motivate promisors to
keep their promises make third-party observers more likely to punish promise breaking.
This suggests that the determinants of promise-keeping behavior will also drive non-
legal enforcement mechanisms in relational contract settings and situations where third
parties can punish promisors in a decentralized fashion, such that the moral forces of
promise keeping can generate commitment even when the stakes are high. Show more
Permanent link
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000324222Publication status
publishedPublisher
ETH Zurich, Center for Law & EconomicsSubject
promises; norms; first-party enforcement; second-party enforcement; altruistic punishmentOrganisational unit
09629 - Stremitzer, Alexander / Stremitzer, Alexander
More
Show all metadata
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics