Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Gardarsdottir, Stefania O.
dc.contributor.author
De Lena, Edoardo
dc.contributor.author
Romano, Matteo C.
dc.contributor.author
Roussanaly, Simon
dc.contributor.author
Voldsund, Mari
dc.contributor.author
Pérez-Calvo, José-Francisco
dc.contributor.author
Berstad, David O.
dc.contributor.author
Fu, Chao
dc.contributor.author
Anantharaman, Rahul
dc.contributor.author
Sutter, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Gazzani, Matteo
dc.contributor.author
Mazzotti, Marco
dc.contributor.author
Cinti, Giovanni
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-01T15:31:29Z
dc.date.available
2019-03-01T05:17:19Z
dc.date.available
2019-03-01T15:31:29Z
dc.date.issued
2019-02-01
dc.identifier.issn
1996-1073
dc.identifier.other
10.3390/en12030542
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/328396
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000328396
dc.description.abstract
This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 €/tCO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/tCO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/tCO2. Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
MDPI
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
CCS
en_US
dc.subject
Cement
en_US
dc.subject
Techno-economic analysis
en_US
dc.subject
MEA-based absorption
en_US
dc.subject
chilled ammonia
en_US
dc.subject
Membrane-associated CO2 liquefaction
en_US
dc.subject
liquefaction
en_US
dc.subject
oxyfuel
en_US
dc.subject
Calcium looping
en_US
dc.title
Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2019-02-10
ethz.journal.title
Energies
ethz.journal.volume
12
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
3
en_US
ethz.pages.start
542
en_US
ethz.size
20 p.
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.grant
CEMCAP – CO2 capture from cement production
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
Basel
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.leitzahl
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02130 - Dep. Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik / Dep. of Mechanical and Process Eng.::02668 - Inst. f. Energie- und Verfahrenstechnik / Inst. Energy and Process Engineering::03484 - Mazzotti, Marco / Mazzotti, Marco
ethz.leitzahl.certified
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02130 - Dep. Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik / Dep. of Mechanical and Process Eng.::02668 - Inst. f. Energie- und Verfahrenstechnik / Inst. Energy and Process Engineering::03484 - Mazzotti, Marco / Mazzotti, Marco
ethz.grant.agreementno
641185
ethz.grant.fundername
SBFI
ethz.grant.funderDoi
10.13039/501100007352
ethz.grant.program
H2020
ethz.relation.continues
20.500.11850/328395
ethz.date.deposited
2019-03-01T05:17:23Z
ethz.source
SCOPUS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2019-03-01T15:32:43Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2021-02-15T03:46:07Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Technologies%20for%20CO2%20Capture%20from%20Cement%20Production%E2%80%94Part%202:%20Cost%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Energies&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=542&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.au=Gardarsdottir,%20Stefania%20O.&De%20Lena,%20Edoardo&Romano,%20Matteo%20C.&Roussanaly,%20Simon&Voldsund,%20Mari&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en12030542&
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Publication type

Show simple item record