Abstract
Urban planning relies on the definition, modelling and evaluation of multidimensional phenomena for informed decision-making. Urban building energy modelling, for instance, usually requires knowledge about the energy use profile and surface area of each use that takes place within a building. We do not have a detailed understanding of such information for mixed-use developments, which are gaining prominence in urban planning. In this paper, we developed a methodology to quantitatively define the characteristics of mixed-use developments using archetypes of programme profiles (ratios of each programme type) of a city’s mixed-use plots. We applied our methodology in Singapore, resulting in 163 mixed-use zoning archetypes using Singapore’s master plan data and Google Maps API data. In a case study, we demonstrated how these archetypes can be used to provide more detailed data for urban building energy modelling, including energy demand forecasts and energy supply system design. To enable future automation of the workflow, the archetype definitions were represented and stored as a machine-readable ontology. This ontology can later be extended with for example, the mobility properties of archetypes; thus, enabling the archetypes' use in other urban planning applications beyond building energy modelling. Show more
Permanent link
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000589788Publication status
publishedExternal links
Journal / series
Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City ScienceVolume
Pages / Article No.
Publisher
SAGESubject
urban development; city planning; Master plan; Land-use; zoning; Function; Plot; gross plot ratio; gross floor area; knowledge graph; Semantic web; Web Ontology Language; Google Maps; City energy analyst (CEA); Semantic City Planning Systems; machine learning; Tensorflow; SingaporeOrganisational unit
08060 - FCL / FCL08058 - Singapore-ETH Centre (SEC) / Singapore-ETH Centre (SEC)
Related publications and datasets
Is supplemented by: https://doi.org/10.25384/SAGE.21671327.v1
Is new version of: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/528127
More
Show all metadata
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics