Notice
This record is in review state.
Quantify the Unquantifiable: Social Framework for a Regenerative Built Environment
Closed access
Author
Date
2024-04-08Type
- Master Thesis
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics
Abstract
Certification and rating systems aim to reduce harm. However, they still fall under a degenerating system, resulting in incremental changes. This highlights the need to shift towards regenerative systems to create a positive impact. Blockchain technology can address design structures and mental models highlighted by regenerative design principles. Therefore, this study explores how blockchain technology can facilitate the transition from current sustainable certification and rating systems to a more regenerative one. This research question is addressed through a qualitative analysis conducted across three foundational layers, with the main findings validated through interviews.
Certification and rating system’s categories and measurement methods were compared and analyzed. The findings indicate a predominant emphasis on environmental aspects, while social and economic aspects are underrepresented. Further, building quality assessment mainly relies on evaluating building performance based on standards, while user perception, especially in the post-construction phase, is neglected. Regenerative frameworks offer a holistic approach to design aspirations that complement existing certification and rating systems. Comparing them revealed that certification systems have gaps in addressing equity and educational aspects. Furthermore, regenerative frameworks emphasize user involvement by considering decision-makers and community members as co-creators and co-learners. To bridge this gap, different blockchain tools from regenerative finance were analyzed to understand how a regenerative approach can be facilitated. Five key instruments for fostering a regenerative built environment were identified: co-creation, incentivized user involvement, crowdfunding, information transparency, and privacy-preserving feedback collection. These instruments contribute to establishing a governance system and processes for building users, therefore enhancing user involvement, expanding social aspects, and including qualitative indicators, especially in the post-construction phase.
The validation results showed that user involvement could be incentivized by granting voting rights and ensuring transparency in processes. These instruments could contribute to advancing regenerative approaches by enhancing societal wellbeing and initiating grassroots movements. Furthermore, improved information transparency and feedback collection could support the integration of qualitative indicators into certification and rating systems. This would enhance adaptability in certification and rating systems and create value across various stakeholder levels. Show more
Publication status
publishedSubject
Blockchain Technology, Certification and Rating Systems, Regeneration, Regenerative Built Environment, Regenerative FinanceOrganisational unit
02604 - Inst. für Bau- & Infrastrukturmanagement / Inst. Construction&Infrastructure Manag.
More
Show all metadata
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics