Rights / licenseIn Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted
Shorter counterexamples are typically easier to understand. The length of a counterexample, as reported by a model checker, depends on both the algorithm used for state space exploration and the way the property is encoded. We provide necessary and sufficient criteria for a B¨uchi automaton to accept shortest counterexamples. We prove that B¨uchi automata constructed using the approach of Clarke, Grumberg, and Hamaguchi accept shortest counterexamples of future time LTL formulae, while an automaton generated with the algorithm of Gerth et al. (GPVW) may lead to unnecessary long counterexamples. Optimality is lost in the first case as soon as past time operators are included. Adapting a recently proposed encoding for bounded model checking of LTL with past, we construct a B¨uchi automaton that accepts shortest counterexamples for full LTL. We use our method of translating liveness into safety to find shortest counterexamples with a BDD-based symbolic model checker without modifying the model checker itself. Though our method involves a quadratic blowup of the state space, it outperforms SAT-based bounded model checking on a number of examples Show more
External linksFull text via SFX
Journal / seriesTechnical report
PublisherETH, Department of Computer Science
Organisational unit02150 - Departement Informatik / Department of Computer Science
NotesTechnical Reports D-INFK.
MoreShow all metadata